Reasoning Aptitude
DATA SUFFICIENCY MCQs
Total Questions : 590
| Page 55 of 59 pages
Answer: Option D. -> Neither I nor II is sufficient
From I and II, we conclude that Aman went to office by either 10.30 a.m. or 10.35 a.m. train.
From I and II, we conclude that Aman went to office by either 10.30 a.m. or 10.35 a.m. train.
Answer: Option D. -> Neither I nor II is sufficient
From both I and II together, we can conclude that A and B are the children of D, but the sex of A and the third child of D is not known. So, both I and II together are also not sufficient to answer the question.
From both I and II together, we can conclude that A and B are the children of D, but the sex of A and the third child of D is not known. So, both I and II together are also not sufficient to answer the question.
Answer: Option E. -> Both I and II are sufficient
In I and II, the common codes are '5', '#' and '3' and the common words are 'flowers', 'are' and 'good'. Thus, in I, the remaining code '$' stands for 'really'.
In I and II, the common codes are '5', '#' and '3' and the common words are 'flowers', 'are' and 'good'. Thus, in I, the remaining code '$' stands for 'really'.
Answer: Option A. -> I alone is sufficient while II alone is not sufficient
From I, we conclude that P is the mother of M and N, while Q is the daughter-in-law of P and sister-in-law of N. Thus, Q is M's wife and hence, M is N's brother.
From II, we conclude that M and N are the children of S. Also, R is the daughter-in-law of S and sister-in-law of M. So, R is N's wife and thus, N is M's brother. Hence, M is either brother or sister of N.
From I, we conclude that P is the mother of M and N, while Q is the daughter-in-law of P and sister-in-law of N. Thus, Q is M's wife and hence, M is N's brother.
From II, we conclude that M and N are the children of S. Also, R is the daughter-in-law of S and sister-in-law of M. So, R is N's wife and thus, N is M's brother. Hence, M is either brother or sister of N.
Answer: Option B. -> II alone is sufficient while I alone is not sufficient
The colour of fresh grass is 'green' and as given in II, 'green' is called 'brown'. So, the colour of fresh grass is 'brown'.
The colour of fresh grass is 'green' and as given in II, 'green' is called 'brown'. So, the colour of fresh grass is 'brown'.
Answer: Option B. -> II alone is sufficient while I alone is not sufficient
According to I, Hitesh visited the zoo on any of the week days except Tuesday and Thursday.
According to II, Hitesh's mother reached his house day after Monday i.e. on Tuesday.
Thus, Hitesh visited zoo two days before Tuesday i.e. on Sunday.
According to I, Hitesh visited the zoo on any of the week days except Tuesday and Thursday.
According to II, Hitesh's mother reached his house day after Monday i.e. on Tuesday.
Thus, Hitesh visited zoo two days before Tuesday i.e. on Sunday.
Question 547. Question : The Chairman of a big company visits one department on Monday of every week except for the Monday of third week of every month. When did he visit the Purchase department ?
Statements :
I. He visited Accounts department in the second week of September after having visited Purchase department on the earlier occasion.
II. He had visited Purchase department immediately after visiting Stores department but before visiting Accounts department.
Statements :
I. He visited Accounts department in the second week of September after having visited Purchase department on the earlier occasion.
II. He had visited Purchase department immediately after visiting Stores department but before visiting Accounts department.
Answer: Option A. -> I alone is sufficient while II alone is not sufficient
From I, we can conclude that the Chairman visited Purchase department on Monday of the first week of September.
The time of visit of no department is mentioned in II, which is, therefore, insufficient.
From I, we can conclude that the Chairman visited Purchase department on Monday of the first week of September.
The time of visit of no department is mentioned in II, which is, therefore, insufficient.
Answer: Option E. -> Both I and II are sufficient
From II, we can conclude that (1500 * 3) = 500 boxes were sold on Sunday.
Thus, from I, we find that number of boxes sold on Monday = 500 + 10% of 500 = 550.
From II, we can conclude that (1500 * 3) = 500 boxes were sold on Sunday.
Thus, from I, we find that number of boxes sold on Monday = 500 + 10% of 500 = 550.
Answer: Option E. -> Both I and II are sufficient
From both I and II, we find that:
Prashant's salary = 115% of (90% of Rs 2500) = Rs 2587.50.
From both I and II, we find that:
Prashant's salary = 115% of (90% of Rs 2500) = Rs 2587.50.
Answer: Option D. -> Neither I nor II is sufficient
In I and II, the common codes are 'nip' and 'sre' and the common words are 'is' and 'beautiful' So, 'nip' and 'sre' are the codes for 'is' and 'beautiful'. But, the exact word for 'nip' cannot be found out.
In I and II, the common codes are 'nip' and 'sre' and the common words are 'is' and 'beautiful' So, 'nip' and 'sre' are the codes for 'is' and 'beautiful'. But, the exact word for 'nip' cannot be found out.
Latest Videos
Latest Test Papers
Login With Google
Old way of Login
Login With Email