Reasoning Aptitude
DATA SUFFICIENCY MCQs
Total Questions : 590
| Page 54 of 59 pages
Answer: Option A. -> Only I and II
From I, we have: P > D, P > N, T > P i.e. T > P > D > N or T > P > N > D ...(i)
From II, we have: R > Q, T > R i.e. T > R > Q ...(ii)
From III, we have: T > Q, R > Q ...(iii)
Clearly, from (i) and (ii), we conclude that T is taller than each one of P, N, D, R and Q. So, T is the tallest.
From I, we have: P > D, P > N, T > P i.e. T > P > D > N or T > P > N > D ...(i)
From II, we have: R > Q, T > R i.e. T > R > Q ...(ii)
From III, we have: T > Q, R > Q ...(iii)
Clearly, from (i) and (ii), we conclude that T is taller than each one of P, N, D, R and Q. So, T is the tallest.
Answer: Option C. -> Only I and III
To find the code for 'come', we need to have two statements which have one common code word and 'come' as the common word, which is there in I and III.
To find the code for 'come', we need to have two statements which have one common code word and 'come' as the common word, which is there in I and III.
Question 533. Question : How is the girl in the photograph related to Kunal?
Statements :
I. Pointing to the photograph, Kunal said, "She is the mother of my father's only granddaughter".
II. Kunal has no siblings.
III. Pointing to the photograph, Kunal said, "She is the only daughter-in-law of my mother."
Statements :
I. Pointing to the photograph, Kunal said, "She is the mother of my father's only granddaughter".
II. Kunal has no siblings.
III. Pointing to the photograph, Kunal said, "She is the only daughter-in-law of my mother."
Answer: Option D. -> Either only III or only I and II
From I, we conclude that the girl is either Kunal's or his brother's wife. But, according to II, Kunal has no siblings.
So, from both I and II, we conclude that the girl is Kunal's wife.
From III, we find that the girl is the only daughter-in-law of Kunal's mother i.e. she is Kunal's wife.
From I, we conclude that the girl is either Kunal's or his brother's wife. But, according to II, Kunal has no siblings.
So, from both I and II, we conclude that the girl is Kunal's wife.
From III, we find that the girl is the only daughter-in-law of Kunal's mother i.e. she is Kunal's wife.
Answer: Option D. -> I, II and III together are not sufficient
From I, II and III, we conclude that all P, Q, R, T and U are children of X. Of these, Q and U are male while R and T are female. But the sex of P cannot be determined.
From I, II and III, we conclude that all P, Q, R, T and U are children of X. Of these, Q and U are male while R and T are female. But the sex of P cannot be determined.
Answer: Option C. -> Only I and III
To find the code for 'come', we need to have two statements which have one common code word and 'come' as the common word, which is there in I and III.
To find the code for 'come', we need to have two statements which have one common code word and 'come' as the common word, which is there in I and III.
Answer: Option D. -> Neither I nor II is sufficient
From I, we have the order : S, -, -, -, Q. From II, we have the order : R, T. Combining the above two, we get two possible orders : S, R, T, P, Q or S, P, R, T, Q. Thus, either T or R is in the middle.
From I, we have the order : S, -, -, -, Q. From II, we have the order : R, T. Combining the above two, we get two possible orders : S, R, T, P, Q or S, P, R, T, Q. Thus, either T or R is in the middle.
Answer: Option E. -> Both I and II are sufficient
From I, we find that number of speakers who attended programme =18-(1/6) of 18 = 15.
From II, we find that one-third of 15 i.e. 5 speakers gave 2 speeches each, while each of the remaining 10 speakers delivered only one speech.
So, total number of speeches delivered = (5 x 2 + 10 x 1) = 20.
From I, we find that number of speakers who attended programme =18-(1/6) of 18 = 15.
From II, we find that one-third of 15 i.e. 5 speakers gave 2 speeches each, while each of the remaining 10 speakers delivered only one speech.
So, total number of speeches delivered = (5 x 2 + 10 x 1) = 20.
Answer: Option C. -> Either I or II is sufficient
From I, we conclude that P is 9th from the top. Thus, in a class of 30 students, P ranks 22nd from the bottom.
From II, we conclude that P is 22nd from the bottom.
From I, we conclude that P is 9th from the top. Thus, in a class of 30 students, P ranks 22nd from the bottom.
From II, we conclude that P is 22nd from the bottom.
Answer: Option D. -> Neither I nor II is sufficient
Clearly, even both I and II together do not reveal the exact time of departure of the train today.
Clearly, even both I and II together do not reveal the exact time of departure of the train today.
Answer: Option E. -> Both I and II are sufficient
From I, we have: D > A, D > C.
From II, we have: E > B > D.
Combining the above two, we get :E > B > D > A > C or E > B > D >C > A.
Thus, E is the tallest.
From I, we have: D > A, D > C.
From II, we have: E > B > D.
Combining the above two, we get :E > B > D > A > C or E > B > D >C > A.
Thus, E is the tallest.
Latest Videos
Latest Test Papers
Login With Google
Old way of Login
Login With Email