Reasoning Aptitude
STATEMENT CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES MCQs
Both are suggestive steps which depend upon person to person. So, both are not conclusions.
I is not conclusion. Youngsters are available; that is why he is talking about blocking of youngster's place. II does not follow: 'enjoy the game' is related with his playing, not with his captaincy.
-NA-
The maximum number of vacancies is 40. Mathematically, we may represent this as ≤ 40, i.e. either less than 40 or 40. Hence, either I or II.
Either he will be corrupt or honest. The two together are exhaustive.
The statement does not say why the poor societies suffer. Hence I does not follow. II also does not follow because the statement merely states a fact; it does not go into the merits of the fact.
I does not follow. After all, the remaining 30% is processed on other company's platforms. II also does not follow. It is true company XYZ has to make efforts. But why more efforts? When it enjoys such a large market share, the efforts should rather be less.
I does not follow because it makes a comparison with "other states". Now, in the statement, other states are now where in the picture. II follows because seeking such loan waivers indicates poor financial condition.
Eligibility criteria are necessary conditions. They can't be treated as sufficient.
I does not follow. It is probable that city 'X' welcomed the order with the expectation that the order would soon be extended in some manner to city 'Y' as well. II also does not follow. That public vehicles have been left out of the order is probably due to other reasons. For example, causing inconvenience to the commuters.