Reasoning Aptitude
STATEMENT CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES MCQs
Both the statements, if true, are valid and strong arguments.
Statement I says that total cost is increasing. But this does not mention whether production is also correspondingly increasing or not. If production is also increasing, then there would not be any problem. Hence, this statement is weak.
Statement II: We do not know whether the employees would be removed or not. It is likely that the employment is not disturbed. Hence this is also a weak argument.
As the Indian cricket team lost continuous six finals, a proper investigation is necessary. So I follows.The statement does not give scope to ascertain the reason. So II does not follow.
The government should set up an inquiry committee to find out the reason so that cases do not get repeated. So I is a proper course of action. Statement II is something which has to be done immediately after the collapse, but the fact that the number of death, etc are known, the time for that action is long over.
Here as the pillion riders are receiving more head injuries, helmet can save them from head injuries. I is a proper course of action.II causes a new problem, i.e., injuries to the driver. So II is not a proper course of action.
Course of action I assumes that the present education system does not teach the basic values of life. So, I is not a proper course of action.Course of action II is not giving any solution.
Two thirds or even more of the world's polar bears will disappear by 2050 due to shrinking summer sea ice, even under moderate projections caused by greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.Course of Action:I. We should control environmental pollution by reducing the emission of greenhouse gases and make people aware of effects of greenhouse gases through media.II. Shift the polar bears to the other parts of the world, like Antarctica, where thick layer of ice is available.
As the cause for extinction of polar bears is green house gases, we should reduce that. So, I is a proper course of action. Shifting of all the polar bears is not feasible and also the environment may not be suitable for them. So II is a not a proper course of action.
For all the deals, the willingness of both the party is a must. Hence I follow from the statement. II can't be concluded from the given statement.
Nothing can be concluded about "money and power" from the given statement. Hence I does not follow. II follows from the statement. If Councillors are not given powers, they can't fulfill their responsibilities and the post of Councillors will become useless.
If I were true, the board would not warn farmers to regularise their electric connection. Hence I does not follow. Nothing can be concluded about the size of the farms and their need of electricity for agriculture. Hence II does not follow.