Sail E0 Webinar

Reasoning Aptitude

STATEMENT & ARGUMENTS MCQs

Total Questions : 41 | Page 4 of 5 pages
Question 31.

Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument? Give answer (a) if only Argument I is strong (b) if only Argument II is strong (c) if either I or II is strong (d) if neither I nor II is strong (e) if both I and II are strong.




  • Statement:

  • Should the women be advised not to travel alone at night in view of the increasing incidences of rape and sexual abuse?

  • Argument :

  • I. No, instead the government should take measures to control such incidences.

  • II. Yes, it is difficult to even for the police department to control such cases.

  1.    if only Argument I is strong
  2.    if only Argument II is strong
  3.    if either I or II is strong
  4.    if neither I nor II is strong
  5.    if both I and II are strong.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option D. -> if neither I nor II is strong
Answer: (d)
Argument I does not establish proper relation with the statement.
Argument II may be an opinion and has not been discussed in the given statement.
Hence, I and II both are weak.
Question 32.

Directions: Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer (a) if only argument I is strong; (b) if only argument II is strong; (c) if either I or II is strong; (d) if neither I nor II is strong and (e) if both I and II are strong.




  • Statement:

  • Should agriculture in rural India be mechanized?

  • Argument :

  • I. Yes. It would lead to higher production.

  • II. No. Many villagers would be left unemployed.

  1.    if only argument I is strong;
  2.    if only argument II is strong;
  3.    if either I or II is strong;
  4.    if neither I nor II is strong and
  5.    if both I and II are strong.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option A. -> if only argument I is strong;
Answer: (a)
Clearly, mechanization would speed up the work and increase production. So, the argument I is strong enough.
Argument II is vague because mechanization will only eliminate wasteful employment, not create unemployment.
Question 33.

Directions: Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer (a) if only argument I is strong; (b) if only argument II is strong; (c) if either I or II is strong; (d) if neither I nor II is strong and (e) if both I and II are strong.




  • Statement:

  • Should India give away Kashmir to Pakistan?

  • Argument :

  • I. No. Kashmir is a beautiful state. It earns a lot of foreign exchange for India.

  • II. Yes. This would help settle conflicts.

  1.    if only argument I is strong;
  2.    if only argument II is strong;
  3.    if either I or II is strong;
  4.    if neither I nor II is strong and
  5.    if both I and II are strong.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option A. -> if only argument I is strong;
Answer: (a)
Clearly, India cannot part with a state that is a major foreign exchange earner to it. So, argument I holds strong.
Further, giving away a piece of land unconditionally and unreasonably is no solution to settle disputes. So, argument II is vague.
Question 34.

Directions: Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer (a) if only argument I is strong; (b) if only argument II is strong; (c) if either I or II is strong; (d) if neither I nor II is strong and (e) if both I and II are strong.




  • Statement:

  • Should there be more than one High Courts in each state in India?

  • Argument :

  • I. No. This will be a sheer wastage of taxpayers' money.

  • II. Yes. This will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a very long time.

  1.    if only argument I is strong;
  2.    if only argument II is strong;
  3.    if either I or II is strong;
  4.    if neither I nor II is strong and
  5.    if both I and II are strong.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option B. -> if only argument II is strong;
Answer: (b)
Clearly, an increase in the number of High Courts will surely speed up the work and help to do away with the pending cases. So, argument II holds strong.
In light of this, the expenditure incurred would be ‘utilization', not 'wastage’ of money. So, argument I do not hold.
Question 35.

Directions: Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer (a) if only argument I is strong; (b) if only argument II is strong; (c) if either I or II is strong; (d) if neither I nor II is strong and (e) if both I and II are strong.




  • Statement:

  • Should all the practising doctors be brought under Government control so that they get a salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost?

  • Argument :

  • I. No. How can any country do such an undemocratic thing?

  • II. Yes. Despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate, unethical medical practices.

  1.    if only argument I is strong;
  2.    if only argument II is strong;
  3.    if either I or II is strong;
  4.    if neither I nor II is strong and
  5.    if both I and II are strong.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option B. -> if only argument II is strong;
Answer: (b)
A doctor treating a patient individually can mislead the patient into wrong and unnecessary treatment for his personal gain. So, argument II holds strong.
Also, a policy beneficial to common people cannot be termed 'undemocratic’. So, I is vague.
Question 36.

Directions: Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer (a) if only argument I is strong; (b) if only argument II is strong; (c) if either I or II is strong; (d) if neither I nor II is strong and (e) if both I and II are strong.




  • Statement:

  • Should the educated unemployed youth be paid "unemployment allowance" by the Government?

  • Argument :

  • I. Yes. It will provide them some monetary help to either seek employment or to kickstart some 'self-employment' venture.

  • II. No. It will dampen their urge to do something to earn their livelihood and thus promote idleness among the unemployed youth.

  1.    if only argument I is strong;
  2.    if only argument II is strong;
  3.    if either I or II is strong;
  4.    if neither I nor II is strong and
  5.    if both I and II are strong.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option E. -> if both I and II are strong.
Answer: (e)
Young people, who do not get employment due to a large number of applicants in all fields, must surely be given an allowance so that they can support themselves.
So, argument I is valid. However, such allowances would mar the spirit to work, in them and make them idle. So, argument II also holds.
Question 37.

Directions: Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer (a) if only argument I is strong; (b) if only argument II is strong; (c) if either I or II is strong; (d) if neither I nor II is strong and (e) if both I and II are strong.




  • Statement:

  • Should India create a huge oil reserve like some Western countries to face difficult situations in the future?

  • Argument :

  • I. No. There is no need to block a huge amount of foreign exchange and keep the money idle.

  • II. Yes. This will help India withstand shocks of a sudden rise in oil prices due to unforeseen circumstances.

  1.    if only argument I is strong;
  2.    if only argument II is strong;
  3.    if either I or II is strong;
  4.    if neither I nor II is strong and
  5.    if both I and II are strong.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option B. -> if only argument II is strong;
Answer: (b)
Oil, being an essential commodity, our country must keep it in reserve. So, argument I is vague.
while argument II holds as it provides a substantial reason for the same.
Question 38.

Directions: Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer (a) if only argument I is strong; (b) if only argument II is strong; (c) if either I or II is strong; (d) if neither I nor II is strong and (e) if both I and II are strong.




  • Statement:

  • Should higher education be restricted to only those who can bear the expenditure?

  • Argument :

  • I. Yes. Higher education is very costly, hence it should not be given free.

  • II. No. There are a large number of brilliant students who cannot afford to pay and they should be given higher education.

  1.    if only argument I is strong;
  2.    if only argument II is strong;
  3.    if either I or II is strong;
  4.    if neither I nor II is strong and
  5.    if both I and II are strong.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option B. -> if only argument II is strong;
Answer: (b)
For the all-round progress of the nation, all the students, especially the talented and intelligent ones, must avail of higher education, even if the government has to pay for it.
So, only argument II holds.
Question 39.

Directions: Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer (a) if only argument I is strong; (b) if only argument II is strong; (c) if either I or II is strong; (d) if neither I nor II is strong and (e) if both I and II are strong.




  • Statement :

  • Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises?

  • Argument :

  • I. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security, and earning, what would they do?

  • II. Yes. In a competitive world, the rule is 'survival of the fittest'.

  1.    if only argument I is strong;
  2.    if only argument II is strong;
  3.    if either I or II is strong;
  4.    if neither I nor II is strong and
  5.    if both I and II are strong.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option A. -> if only argument I is strong;
Answer: (a)
Closing down public-sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged persons out of employment. So, argument I holds. Also, closing down is no solution for a loss-making enterprise.
Rather, its causes of failure should be studied, analyzed and the essential reforms implemented. Even if this does not work out, the enterprise may be privatized. So, argument II is vague.
Question 40.

Directions: Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer (a) if only argument I is strong; (b) if only argument II is strong; (c) if either I or II is strong; (d) if neither I nor II is strong and (e) if both I and II are strong.




  • Statement :

  • Should India develop a national water grid by connecting all the rivers in the country?

  • Argument :

  • I. No. This is not just possible as we do not have the technical know-how.

  • II. Yes. This will greatly help the entire country by effectively channelising the excess water to the areas having a shortage.

  1.    if only argument I is strong;
  2.    if only argument II is strong;
  3.    if either I or II is strong;
  4.    if neither I nor II is strong and
  5.    if both I and II are strong.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option B. -> if only argument II is strong;
Answer: (b)
A single network of all the rivers in the country would surely enable a good distribution of water to all areas. So, argument II holds strong.
Also, a policy beneficial to the nation cannot be hindered owing to a lack of know-how. Ways can be devised to build up such a network. So, argument I is vague.

Latest Videos

Latest Test Papers