Sail E0 Webinar

Exams > Cat > Verbal

READING COMPREHENSION SET I MCQs

Total Questions : 290 | Page 24 of 29 pages
Question 231.


 The author suggests that the role of large institutions as stockholders differs from that of the “old-style capitalist” in part because large institutions:


  1.     invest in the stock of so many companies that they cannot focus attention on the affairs of any single corporation.
  2.     are prohibited by law from owning a majority of a corporation’s stock.
  3.     are influenced by brokers who advise against long-term ownership of stocks.
  4.     are able to put large amounts of stock on the market without depressing the stock’s value.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option B. -> are prohibited by law from owning a majority of a corporation’s stock.
:
B

This question asks you to infer, from information stated in the passage, a way in which the role of large institutions as stockholders differs from that of the “old-style capitalist”.
The best answer is B. According to the passage, the old-style capitalists were able to play a dominant role in the corporations in which they held stock because they owned enough stock to do so. The passage also states that large institutions are legally barred from owning a majority of a company’s stock. From this it can be inferred that large institutions, because their ability to own stock is limited, do not play as dominant a role in the corporations of which they are stockholders as did the old-style capitalists.
Choice A is not correct. The passage does not indicate whether large institutions invest in many companies, few companies, or even just a single company.
Choice C is not the correct answer. The passage does not mention brokers or any other parties who might influence the investment choices made by large institutions.
Choice D is incorrect.The author notes that an institution’ sale of a large amount of stock would, in fact, decrease the stock’s value.


Question 232.


The primary function of the second paragraph of the passage is to:


  1.     identify problems
  2.     warn of consequence
  3.     explain effects
  4.     recommend actions
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option D. -> recommend actions
:
D

This question asks you to determine the main purpose served by the second paragraph of the passage in the context of the passage as a whole.
The best answer is D. The second paragraph is devoted to the author’s recommendations of certain actions, namely, the adoption of new regulations concerning the holding and selling of stock by institutional investors.
Choice A is not the correct answer. The author of the passage identifies a problem-short-term trading done by institutional shareholders-but does so in the first paragraph, not in the second.
Choice B is incorrect. In the second paragraph, the author recommends new regulations regarding shareholding by institutions. Although the author mentions some consequences of the suggested regulations, the author clearly views these consequences as desirable.
Choice C is not correct. The second paragraph contains suggestions about new ways to regulate shareholding by institutions. Although the author asserts that certain effects would result from the proposed regulations, these effects are not explained.


Question 233.


The passage is chiefly concerned with:


  1.     warning that the application of laws affecting trade frequently has unintended consequences.
  2.     demonstrating that foreign-based firms receive more subsidies from their governments than United States firms receive from the United States government.
  3.     advocating the use of trade restrictions for “dumped” products but not for other imports.
  4.     recommending a uniform method for handling claims of unfair trade practices.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option A. -> warning that the application of laws affecting trade frequently has unintended consequences.
:
A
Looking at the case given in the 3rd paragraph, followed by the explanation in the 4th paragraph, we understand that the passage talks about the unintentional consequences of trade laws. Hence, option A is the most suitable answer.
Question 234.


Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?


  1.     The validity of the data collected by using two different research methods is compared.
  2.     The usefulness of a research method is questioned and then a new method is proposed.
  3.     The historical backgrounds of two currently used research methods are chronicled.
  4.      The use of a research method is described and the limitations of the results obtained are discussed.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option D. ->  The use of a research method is described and the limitations of the results obtained are discussed.
:
D

The best answer is D. The first paragraph of the passage identifies a research method (recording life stories) and explains the method’s uses. The second and third paragraphs explain limitations of the method’s results. The final paragraph explains why the research method is useful despite its limitations. Choice A, B, and C are incorrect because only one research method is discussed, not two.


Question 235.


The passage suggests that which of the following is most likely to be true of United States trade laws?


  1.     They will enable manufacturers in the United States to compete more profitably outside the United States.
  2.     They will affect United States trade with Canada more negatively than trade with other nations.
  3.     Those that help one unit within a parent company will not necessarily help other units in the company.
  4.     Those that are applied to international companies will accomplish their intended result.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option C. -> Those that help one unit within a parent company will not necessarily help other units in the company.
:
C
The best answer is C. The passage suggests that trade laws can be used against the US companies - this isn't what is intended. 
Choice A - mentions nothing about US companies competing outside their own country. Choice B - When an answer choice makes a comparison, aspects of all sides should be known, which is not the case here. Choice D - This goes directly against the passage statements: because now it is difficult to tell who is the parent company.
Question 236.


Which of the following is most similar to the actions of nineteenth-century ethnologists in their editing of the life stories of Native Americans?


  1.     A witness in a jury trial invokes the Fifth Amendment in order to avoid relating personally incriminating evidence.
  2.     A stockbroker refuses to divulge the source of her information on the possible future increase in a stock’s value.
  3.     A sports announcer describes the action in a team sport with which he is unfamiliar.
  4.     A chef purposely excludes the special ingredient from the recipe of his prizewinning dessert.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option C. -> A sports announcer describes the action in a team sport with which he is unfamiliar.
:
C

The best answer is C. Lines 22-23 suggest that ethnologists “rarely spent enough time with the tribes they were observing.” Ethnologists who did not spend enough time with tribes they were observing were unlikely to be sufficiently familiar with the culture and customs of those tribes. Such ethnologists nevertheless attempted to describe the lives of tribal members. This attempt can be seen as analogous to the announcer’s attempt to describe the actions in a team sport with which he is unfamiliar. Choice A, B, and D can be eliminated because the passage does not suggest ethnologists deliberately withheld information.


Question 237.


The last paragraph performs which of the following functions in the passage?


  1.     It summarizes the discussion thus far and suggests additional areas of research.
  2.     It discusses an exceptional case in which the results expected by the author of the passage were not obtained.
  3.     It presents a recommendation based on the evidence presented earlier.
  4.     It cites a specific case that illustrates a problem presented more generally in the previous paragraph.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option D. -> It cites a specific case that illustrates a problem presented more generally in the previous paragraph.
:
D
The best answer is D.
Looking at the answer options, the last paragraph talks about a particular case that illustrates a problem presented more generally in the previous paragraph.
Question 238.


It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following about the complaint mentioned in the last paragraph? 


  1.     The ITC acted unfairly toward the complainant in its investigation.
  2.     The complaint violated the intent of import relief laws.
  3.     The response of the ITC to the complaint provided suitable relief from unfair trade practices to the complainant.
  4.     The ITC did not have access to appropriate information concerning the case.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option B. -> The complaint violated the intent of import relief laws.
:
B

The best answer is B. In the passage the author states that “The bizarre aspect of the complaint was that a foreign conglomerate…was crying for help against a United States company…”. It can be inferred from the passage that import relief laws were designed to protect United States companies from foreign competition. Thus, the lodging of a complaint by a foreign conglomerate against a United States company violated the intent of the laws.


Question 239.


It can be inferred from the passage that the minimal basis for a complaint to the International Trade Commission is which of the following?  


  1.     A foreign competitor has substantially increased the volume of products shipped to the United States.
  2.     A foreign competitor is selling products in the United States at less than fair market value.
  3.     The company requesting import relief has been injured by the sale of imports in the United States.
  4.     The company requesting import relief has been barred from exporting products to the country of its foreign competitor.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option C. -> The company requesting import relief has been injured by the sale of imports in the United States.
:
C
The best answer is C, which can be inferred from the case given in the 3rd paragraph.
Question 240.


The passage warns of which of the following dangers? 


  1.     Companies in the United States may receive no protection from imports unless they actively seek protection from import competition.
  2.     Companies that are United States-owned but operate internationally may not be eligible for protection from import competition under the laws of the countries in which their plants operate.
  3.     Companies that are not United States-owned may seek legal protection from import competition under United States import relief laws.
  4.     Companies in the United States that import raw materials may have to pay duties on those materials.
 Discuss Question
Answer: Option C. -> Companies that are not United States-owned may seek legal protection from import competition under United States import relief laws.
:
C
The best answer is C. On reading the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs, we can conclude that the danger mentioned in option C is warned and none of the remaining options are stated in the passage.

Latest Videos

Latest Test Papers