Reasoning Aptitude > Logical Reasoning
LOGICAL DEDUCTION MCQs
Total Questions : 508
| Page 43 of 51 pages
Answer: Option B. -> Only conclusion II follows
Since the middle term 'chalks' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows. However, II is the converse of the first premise and so it holds.
Since the middle term 'chalks' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows. However, II is the converse of the first premise and so it holds.
Answer: Option B. -> Only conclusion II follows
Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. Thus, only II follows.
Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. Thus, only II follows.
Answer: Option A. -> Only conclusion I follows
Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term. So, only I follows.
Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term. So, only I follows.
Answer: Option A. -> Only conclusion I follows
Since the middle term 'engineer' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows. However, I is the converse of the first premise and thus it holds.
Since the middle term 'engineer' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows. However, I is the converse of the first premise and thus it holds.
Answer: Option C. -> Either I or II follows
The data does not mention whether all intelligent girls are married to bureaucrats. So, either I or II may follow.
The data does not mention whether all intelligent girls are married to bureaucrats. So, either I or II may follow.
Answer: Option B. -> Only conclusion II follows
Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term. So, only II follows.
Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term. So, only II follows.
Answer: Option A. -> Only conclusion I follows
Since one premise is particular and the other premise is negative, the conclusion must be particular negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some desks are not red'. However, I is the converse of the first premise and thus it holds.
Since one premise is particular and the other premise is negative, the conclusion must be particular negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some desks are not red'. However, I is the converse of the first premise and thus it holds.
Answer: Option D. -> Neither I nor II follows
Since the middle term 'divine' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion can be drawn.
Since the middle term 'divine' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion can be drawn.
Answer: Option A. -> Only conclusion I follows
Since both the premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative. However, conclusion II, being an A-type proposition, distributes the term 'cats'.
Since the term 'cats' is distributed in II without being distributed in any of the premises, so conclusion II cannot follow. Thus, only I follows.
Since both the premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative. However, conclusion II, being an A-type proposition, distributes the term 'cats'.
Since the term 'cats' is distributed in II without being distributed in any of the premises, so conclusion II cannot follow. Thus, only I follows.
Answer: Option E. -> Both I and II follow
Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So, II follows. I is the converse of II and so it also holds.
Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So, II follows. I is the converse of II and so it also holds.