Statement: Crime is a function of the criminal's biological makeup and his family relations. Conclusions: I. The incidence of crime is higher in identical twins than in fraternal twins. II. Families in which parents lack in warmth and affection fail to build a moral conscience in the children. Options: A . &nbspIf only conclusion I follows B . &nbspIf only conclusion II follows C . &nbspIf either I or II follows D . &nbspIf neither I nor II follows E . &nbspIf both I and II follow.

Statement: Crime is a function of the criminal's biological makeup and his fa

Question

Directions: In each of the questions given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give your answer: (a) If only conclusion I follows (b) If only conclusion it follows (c) If either I or II follows (d) If neither I nor II follows (e) If both I and II follow.

Statement:

Crime is a function of the criminal's biological makeup and his family relations.

Conclusions:

I. The incidence of crime is higher in identical twins than in fraternal twins.

II. Families in which parents lack in warmth and affection fail to build a moral conscience in the children.

Options:

A . If only conclusion I follows

B . If only conclusion II follows

C . If either I or II follows

D . If neither I nor II follows

E . If both I and II follow.

Answer: Option D
Answer: (d)
Both I and II are invalid as the statement itself is vague and ambiguous which is unable to make proper connectivity with the given conclusions.

Was this answer helpful ?

Next Question