Question
The following question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered
I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak'
argument.
Statement : Should cutting of trees be banned altogether ?Arguments : I. Yes. It is very much necessary to do so to restore ecological balance.
II. No. A total ban would harm timber based industries.
Answer: Option E
Was this answer helpful ?
Clearly, trees play a vital role in maintaining ecological balance and so must be
preserved. So. argument I holds. Also, trees form the hasic source of timber and a
complete ban on cutting of trees would harm timber based industries. So, only a
controlled cutting of trees should be allowed and the loss replenished by planting more
trees. So, argument II is also valid.
Was this answer helpful ?
More Questions on This Topic :
Latest Videos
Latest Test Papers
Submit Solution