Question
Q. In which of the following cases was Right to Livelihood made an inherent part of Right to Life by the Supreme Court ?
Answer: Option B
:
B
Explanation:
The Supreme Court gave an important decision regarding the rights of slum-dwellers in Bombay in response to a Public Interest Litigation filed by a social activist, Olga Tellis against Bombay Municipal Corporation in 1985. The petition claimed the right to live on pavements or in slums because there was no alternative accommodation available close to their place of work. If they were forced to move they would lose their livelihood as well.The Supreme Court said, “Article 21 of the Constitution which guaranteed the right to life included the right to livelihood. Therefore If pavement dwellers were to be evicted they should first be provided alternative accommodation under the right to shelter.”
Was this answer helpful ?
:
B
Explanation:
The Supreme Court gave an important decision regarding the rights of slum-dwellers in Bombay in response to a Public Interest Litigation filed by a social activist, Olga Tellis against Bombay Municipal Corporation in 1985. The petition claimed the right to live on pavements or in slums because there was no alternative accommodation available close to their place of work. If they were forced to move they would lose their livelihood as well.The Supreme Court said, “Article 21 of the Constitution which guaranteed the right to life included the right to livelihood. Therefore If pavement dwellers were to be evicted they should first be provided alternative accommodation under the right to shelter.”
Was this answer helpful ?
More Questions on This Topic :
Latest Videos
Latest Test Papers
Submit Solution