Reasoning Aptitude
LOGIC MCQs
Conclusion I being an A type proposition, distributes the term 'roots'. Since the term
'roots' is distributed in I without being distributed in any of the premises, so
conclusion I cannot follow. Conclusion II cannot follow as it contains the middle term.
The following questions two statements are given and these statements are followed by two conclusions
numbered I and II. You have to take tfie given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance
from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which ofthe given conclusions logically
follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements : All men are dogs. ll. All dogs are cats.Conclusions : I. All men are cats. II. All cats are men.
Since both the premises are affirmative, the conclusion must be affirmative. However,
conclusion II being an A type proposition, distributes the term 'goats'. Since the term
'goats' is distributed in II without being distributed in any of the premises, so
conclusion II cannot follow. Thus, only I follows.
Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular, so both I and II follows
The following questions two statements are given and these statements are followed by two conclusions
numbered I and II. You have to take tfie given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance
from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which ofthe given conclusions logically
follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements : All bags are cakes.
All lamps are cakes.
Conclusions : I. Some lamps are bags.
II. No lamp is bag.
Both the premises being A type propositions, the middle term 'cakes forming the
predicate is not distributed in an> of £hem.
Since the middle term is not distributed even once in the premises, so no conclusion
follows.
The following questions two statements are given and these statements are followed by two conclusions
numbered I and II. You have to take tfie given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance
from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which ofthe given conclusions logically
follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements : All tubes are handles.All cups are handles.
Conclusions : I. All cups are tubes.
II. Some handles are not cups.
Both the premises are A type propositions. So, in either, the middle term 'handles'
forming the predicate is not distributed.
Since the middle term is not distributed even once in the premises, so no conclusion
follows.
Both the premises are particular, no conclusion follows are the middle term is not distributed even once in the premises.
The first premise is an A type preposition, so the middle term 'tables' forming the predicate is not distributed.
The II premise is an I type proposition. So, the middle term forming the predicate is not distributed. Since the middle term is not distributed even once in the premises, so no conclusion follows.
Since one premise is negative, the conclusion must be negative. So II cannot follow. Also the term 'camera' is distributed in I without being distributed in any of the premises. So, conclusion I also does not follows.
Since both the premises are particular no conclusion follows.
Since one premise is particular the conclusion must be particular. So only conclusion II follows