Reasoning Aptitude
STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MCQs
Statement Conclusions And Inferences
We cannot check the validity of the two given statements but if both are true, each will present a strong argument.
"Free food grain supply" implies that the neighbouring country is in trouble. Statement I explains the troubles and is a strong argument. The fact that the other country is an enemy does not stop us from helping them as we have already understood that it is in trouble. Therefore statement II is a weak statement.
Every year Malaria gets rampant after the rains.Courses of Action:I. Pesticides should be properly sprayed on a regular basis.II. People should be supplied with mosquito nets and mosquito coils free by the government.III. Using various means of media, people should be informed about the methods to be adopted for prevention from these seasonal diseases.
Here the problem is malaria and we know that the cause of malaria is mosquito. As we know that mosquitoes can be controlled by pesticides. So, I is a proper course of action.Course of action II is not practically possible because that will cause a burden on the government. Hence it does not follow.Course of action III is feasible and also not very costly, hence it is a proper course of action.
Here the course of action I is a negative course of action. Course of action II can reduce rigging, as it says "they should be made to cast their votes". Hence it follows.Course of action III can reduce rigging. As some authority should scrutinise the polling centers so that polling is conducted without rigging.
Students attendance in regular colleges is falling day by day, while in private coaching centers the situation is just the opposite.Courses of Action:I. Students must be given individual attention.II. At least once in a week they must be given a test.III. Without proper attendance, a student must not be allowed to attend the final examinations.
Course of action I is based on the assumption that the students are not attending the class due to lack of individual attention, hence I does not follow. For the similar reason course of action II is not proper course of action. II is not a proper course of action. Course of action III force the student to attend the class without solving the problem of not attending the classes. Hence, III does not follow.
Here the problem is a multiparty system which is causing instability.Course of action I is talking about bi-party system and hence this can solve the problem.Holding election for multiple number of times is not possible. Hence II does not follow.Course of action III does not solve the problem the problem may re-occur again in future.
Here the problem is loud noise made by loud speakers and tape records. Hence, course of action I and II do not follow.Course of action III is a possible course of action, and this will help to reduce the loud noise to a permissible limit.
II may be an assumption of the speaker. But certainly it is not a conclusion.
-NA-
With the limited resources and overpopulation it is very hard to provide decent quality of life. Hence II follows.