In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

• (A) If only conclusion I follows


• (B) If only conclusion II follows


• (C) If either I or II follows


• (D) If neither I nor II follows and


• (E) If both I and II follow.

Statements: Government has spoiled many top ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.

Conclusions:

1. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.


2. The Director of the financial institute should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

• (A) If only conclusion I follows


• (B) If only conclusion II follows


• (C) If either I or II follows


• (D) If neither I nor II follows and


• (E) If both I and II follow.

Statements: The old order changed yielding place to new.

Conclusions:

1. Change is the law of nature.


2. Discard old ideas because they are old.

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

• (A) If only conclusion I follows


• (B) If only conclusion II follows


• (C) If either I or II follows


• (D) If neither I nor II follows and


• (E) If both I and II follow.

Statements: In a one day cricket match, the total runs made by a team were 200. Out of these 160 runs were made by spinners.

Conclusions:

1. 80% of the team consists of spinners.


2. The opening batsmen were spinners.

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

• (A) If only conclusion I follows


• (B) If only conclusion II follows


• (C) If either I or II follows


• (D) If neither I nor II follows and


• (E) If both I and II follow.

Statements: Population increase coupled with depleting resources is going to be the scenario of many developing countries in days to come.

Conclusions:

1. The population of developing countries will not continue to increase in future.


2. It will be very difficult for the governments of developing countries to provide its people decent quality of life.

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

• (A) If only conclusion I follows


• (B) If only conclusion II follows


• (C) If either I or II follows


• (D) If neither I nor II follows and


• (E) If both I and II follow.

Statements: Prime age school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers.

Conclusions:

1. Method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised.


2. A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV. on the readership of newspapers.

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

• (A) If only conclusion I follows


• (B) If only conclusion II follows


• (C) If either I or II follows


• (D) If neither I nor II follows and


• (E) If both I and II follow.

Statements: The manager humiliated Sachin in the presence of his colleagues.

Conclusions:

1. The manager did not like Sachin.


2. Sachin was not popular with his colleagues.

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

• (A) If only conclusion I follows


• (B) If only conclusion II follows


• (C) If either I or II follows


• (D) If neither I nor II follows and


• (E) If both I and II follow.

Statements: Women's organisations in India have welcomed the amendment of the Industrial Employment Rules 1946 to curb sexual harassment at the work place.

Conclusions:

1. Sexual harassment of women at work place is more prevalent in India as compared to other developed countries.


2. Many organisations in India will stop recruiting women to avoid such problems.

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

• (A) If only conclusion I follows


• (B) If only conclusion II follows


• (C) If either I or II follows


• (D) If neither I nor II follows and


• (E) If both I and II follow.

Statements: In a highly centralised power structure, in which even senior cabinet ministers are prepared to reduce themselves to pathetic countries or yesmen airing views that are primarily intended to anticipate or reflect the Prime Minister's own performances, there can be no place for any consensus that is quite different from real or contrived unanimity of opinion, expressed through a well orchestrated endorsement of the leader's actions.

Conclusions:

1. The Ministers play safe by not giving anti-government views.


2. The Prime Minister does not encourage his colleagues to render their own views.