Question
Directions: In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Give your answer:
If only conclusion I follows;If only conclusion II follows;If either I or II follows;If neither I nor II follows; andIf both I and II follow.- Statement:
- Although we have rating agencies like crisil, ICRA, there is a demand to have a separate rating agency for IT companies to protect investors.
- Conclusions:
- I. Assessment of financial worth of IT companies calls for a separate set of skills, insight, and competencies.
- II. Now, the investors investing in IT companies will get the protection of their investment.
Answer: Option A
Answer: (a)
The need for a separate rating agency for IT companies clearly indicates that such an assessment requires a separate set of skills. So, I follows.
However, the statement indicates only the need or demand and neither the future course of action nor its after-effects can be judged. So, II does not follow.
Was this answer helpful ?
Answer: (a)
The need for a separate rating agency for IT companies clearly indicates that such an assessment requires a separate set of skills. So, I follows.
However, the statement indicates only the need or demand and neither the future course of action nor its after-effects can be judged. So, II does not follow.
Was this answer helpful ?
Submit Solution